Disclaimer: Not my work/words. Hope you like this though. :)
You always hurt the one you love, the one you should not hurt at all;You always take the sweetest rose, and crush it till the petals fall;You always break the kindest heart, with a hasty word you can't recall;So if I broke your heart last night, it's because I love you most of all. (The Mills Brothers)
You always hurt the one you love, the one you should not hurt at all;You always take the sweetest rose, and crush it till the petals fall;You always break the kindest heart, with a hasty word you can't recall;So if I broke your heart last night, it's because I love you most of all. (The Mills Brothers)
It is easy to understand why someone who doesn't love
another person might break the heart of this person-when we do not love those
who love us, we are likely to hurt them. However, the above song refers to
hurting the one we do love. How can one both love and hurt the same person?
Lovers can easily hurt the beloved without intending to do
so. Because the lovers are so significant to each other, any innocent remark or
action can be interpreted in a manner that the other person did not intend and
hence be hurtful. For instance, someone might devote a lot of time to her work,
thereby neglecting, and inadvertently hurting, her partner. The more time
two people spend together, the greater the likelihood that this will occur. Our
beloveds hold great significance for us and this makes these people a source of
both great happiness and deep sadness; they can bring us great joy, but they
can also hurt us deeply.
In situations in which we have nothing of value to lose, we
seldom experience disappointment. In love, which involves our happiness and
many of our most precious experiences, there is a great deal to lose. Hence,
disappointment and frustration, and consequently hurt, are common. It has been
said that completely blissful love does not exist. Indeed, in a survey of over
500 lovers, almost all of them assumed that passionate love is a
bittersweet experience. Similarly, it has been found that people low in
defensiveness have more experiences of love than do highly defensive people.
This link suggests that to love is to make oneself vulnerable in ways that
enhance the possibility of pain.
These and other considerations indicate how easily you can
hurt the one you love without intending to do so. However, the explanation for
deliberately hurting the person you love is far more complex. Certainly, one
major factor in hurting the beloved deliberately is related to the central role
that mutual dependency plays in love.
Mutual dependency may exist in inappropriate proportions:
lovers can consider their dependency on the partner to be too great or too
little. Hurting the beloved may be one resort, usually the last one, which the
lover takes to bring this dependency to its appropriate proportion. Mutual
dependency has many advantages, stemming from the fact that two people are
joined together in a relationship attempting to increase each other's
happiness. However, a sense of independence is also important for people's
self-esteem. Indeed, in a study of anger, the most common motive for
its generation was to assert authority or independence, or to improve self-image. Anger has been perceived as a useful means to strengthen or readjust a
relationship.
This type of behavior is frequent in the child-parent
relationship: children often hurt parents in order to express their
independence. This behavior is also part of romantic love in which mutual
dependence may threaten each partner's independence. Sometimes lovers hurt
their beloved in order to show their independence. Other times, however,
hurting the beloved expresses an opposite wish: the lover's wish for more
dependency and attention. Indeed, a common complaint of married women, far
more than of married men, is that their partners do not spend enough time
with them.
By hurting the beloved, the lover wishes to signal that
their mutual relationship, and in particular their mutual dependency, should be
modified. Hurting the beloved may be the last alarm bell that warns of the
lover's difficulties; it is an extreme measure signaling urgency. If the
relationship is strong enough, as the lover wishes it to be, it should sustain
this measure. A less extreme and more common measure employed is that of
moodiness. Moodiness, which imposes a small cost on the relationship, may
function as both an alarm bell and as an assessment device to test the strength
of the bond. Love involves a dynamic process of mutual adaptation, but not all
adaptive processes are smooth and enjoyable; hurting the beloved is an example
in kind.
Another consideration in light of which the lover may
sometimes hurt the beloved is related to the lack of indifference in love.
Since the lover greatly cares for the beloved and their mutual relationship,
the lover cannot be indifferent toward anything that may harm the beloved,
their relationship, or the lover's own situation. This lack of indifference
toward the beloved may lead the lover to take measures which hurt the other
when viewed within a partial perspective, but can be seen as beneficial from a
global perspective. This is the painful side of care: a close connection exists
between people who help and hurt as well. In the same way that improving
the quality and happiness of our lives may demand some suffering, improving the
quality and happiness of our beloved's life may require such suffering.
As for people who love us but whom we do not love, we may be
indifferent, or at least would not harbor such a deep overall concern.
Accordingly, we may not bother to help them by hurting them. Therefore, people
in love prefer to be hurt by the beloved rather than be treated with
indifference. Jose Ortega y Gasset says that the person in love "prefers
the anguish which her beloved causes her to painless indifference."
Similarly, the saying goes that it is better to break someone's heart than to
do nothing with it. Concerning those who are near and dear, we prefer
anger to indifference.
I do not want to say, as Oscar Wilde did, that "each
man kills the thing he loves"; however, hurting one's beloved is frequent.
Since the beloved is a major source of happiness, this person is also a major
threat to our happiness: more than anyone else, the beloved can ruin our
happiness. Similarly, the security involved in love goes together with the fear
of losing that security. Feeling happy is often bound up with the fear of
losing that happiness. Caring for the beloved sometimes goes together with
hurting the beloved.
Love is closely connected with vulnerability: the ability to
hurt and to be hurt. Although some kinds of hurt in love are intended, most of
them are not.
Nevertheless, someone who deliberately hurts another person
can simultaneously claim to love that person. The phenomenon of emotional
ambivalence, stemming from the presence of two different evaluative
perspectives, can account for such a possibility. The lack of indifference and
mutual dependency typical of love suggests why this frequently occurs in love.
The above considerations can be encapsulated in the
following statement that a lover might express: "Darling, although this
article has given you some justification to hurt me, I am still not sure you
are doing it out of your profound love for me."
From: Aaron Ben-Zeév
No comments:
Post a Comment